My Muscles Are Tight and When I Stretch Them Out They Tighten Up Again

Nosotros alive in deplorable times for bodybuilding. Although broscience is finally losing face, it's being replaced past what I can only describe as bodybuilding nihilism ('nothing-ism'). Null supposedly matters. Nutrient timing? Just eat when you experience like eating. Full-body or split preparation? Whichever you adopt. Eating make clean? Bro, what has washing your food got to do with annihilation?

Skepticism is great, only it'south turning into pessimism that'southward killing the spirit of bodybuilding to always keep improving and e'er push the limits. The nihilism that nothing matters has taken the meaning that nothing works. When nothing works, naught is possible. If somebody gains muscle during their contest prep, he is immediately defendant of steroid use. That'south because many people believe you cannot build muscle and fire fatty at the same fourth dimension. Others say it'southward theoretically possible, merely it won't ever happen in anyone only absolute beginners and steroid users. And yet others say body recomposition programs are the best style to progress and you lot shouldn't cutting or majority as a natural lifter.

Let's look at the facts.

The First Law of Thermodynamics

Y'all've probably heard someone argue that achieving muscle growth and fat loss in the aforementioned day is physically impossible because of thermodynamics. The argument goes equally follows.

1. To build muscle, yous must shop free energy. To lose fat, y'all must burn down energy.
2. When you are in energy surplus, your body stores free energy. When you lot are in a arrears, your body loses energy.
3. Therefore, you lot must be in energy surplus to gain muscle and in a deficit to lose fatty.

The first two points, the premises, are truthful. They refer to the offset law of thermodynamics ('move of energy'), also chosen the law of the conversion of energy. This law ways free energy cannot but disappear. It has to go somewhere. Building new fat or muscle cells requires free energy and breaking them down releases energy. However, point 3, the conclusion, is false.

Why? Considering muscle and fat tissue are different functional compartments in the body. Equally a upshot, your torso directs calories towards muscle and fat mass independently. Researchers telephone call this calorie sectionalisation and the resulting modify in fat and muscle mass are expressed every bit a P-ratio.

The body does need other substrates to build muscle mass of course. You need building blocks to build a firm. Let'southward wait at what exactly the trunk needs. Heymsfield et al. (1982) were kind enough to cutting upwardly some dead people for united states, so I've aggregated their results from the healthy control group in the following image. This is the composition of human being muscle tissue.

So what do we need to build muscle mass?

1. Lots of water (Water). You can beverage plenty of that during a cut, so no problems there.
2. Several kinds of poly peptide. Again you can consume enough protein on a cut, so no problems hither either. For the Dna and RNA we also need nitrogen and phosphate, but those can be derived from dietary protein.
3. Glycogen and triglycerides. This basically just comes downwards to energy, considering glucose and fatty are non-essential nutrients that can be created past the body itself. We need a lot more energy too, because the protein synthesis for the musculus edifice process is an energy costly process itself.

In curt, nosotros demand poly peptide, h2o and energy. Where do we get the free energy? Like shooting fish in a barrel. Your body has plenty of that. Let's have myself in average photoshoot condition at most 87 kg, 6% body fat. People think of this conditioning equally 'having almost no fatty', but the truth is, in that location's even so plenty of fat even then: 5.2 kg to be exact. If we catechumen that to metabolizable energy based on the density figures I gave in my commodity about free energy balance myths, the body still has over 49000 calories right at that place for the taking. That'due south plenty to build pounds and pounds of muscle without even taking into account y'all're however consuming energy in your diet as well.

Thus, as long as your body has sufficient stimulus to build muscle mass, which it has if your training plan is optimized, it has both the means and the will to build musculus mass while simultaneously losing fatty. There you go, muscle growth during a cutting.

Similarly, your trunk is capable of storing fat while burning muscle. The conservation of free energy law merely means that you lot must gain free energy in free energy surplus and lose free energy in a arrears. It says goose egg about how these calories are partitioned or about how your torso limerick changes.

In conclusion, thermodynamics exercise not dominion out the possibility of getting more than muscular while leaning out at the same time.

Outside the textbook

Theory is prissy and all, simply what happens in existent life? Practice people actually manage to build muscle while losing fat?

Overweight (26% trunk fat) police officers starting a weight training programme lost 9.3 pounds of fat and gained viii.8 pounds of lean body mass in 12 weeks.

Only they were fat, so how is that relevant for u.s.a.? Ironically, it's usually the self-proclaimed science-based skeptics that say yous can't build muscle and lose fatty at the aforementioned time. Even so people in dozens if not hundreds of studies lose fat and build muscle at the same time when they start training, even sometimes when they merely do endurance grooming (see here and hither and here, for example). Immature, quondam, healthy, unhealthy, male person, female, obese, lean, they all reach body recomposition. Even on mediocre grooming programs with crappy diets with suboptimal poly peptide intakes. Even elderly men and women over 60 years old generally gain effectually iv pounds of lean trunk mass with the same corporeality of fatty loss in 12 to 16 weeks (see hither and here, for example).

But all these people were barely trained, so once more how is that relevant for u.s.a.?

Here's an example of one of my clients that had over twenty years of training experience and was already benching 235 lb (107 kg) for 5 reps before the coaching. He performed a DXA scan every ~3 weeks during my coaching. In 2 months and 18 days, he lost half dozen.7 lb (3.1 kg) of fatty while gaining almost exactly the same corporeality of muscle. His weight during the last scan was within 8 grams of his weight when we started. So this is an case of virtually perfect body recomposition. You tin find the anonymized DXA scan overview here and his progress photos below.

Yet not convinced body recomposition is possible for trained individuals? Many of my clients with access to reliable trunk fat measurement techniques, such as DXA (recollect 'x-ray') scans, accept gained muscle while losing fatty. Of grade you'd be wise to exist skeptical of what I say virtually my client results, and then let's look at some scientific research. A 2022 scientific review paper concluded: "Although many suggest that this merely occurs in untrained/novice and overweight/obese populations, at that place is a substantial corporeality of literature demonstrating this body recomposition phenomenon in resistance-trained individuals."

• Ane written report looked at elite gymnasts. These were national level athletes with a training volume of 30 hours a week. They could do 17 pull-ups where their chest touched the bar (try doing i). They were put on a 1,971 calorie, ketogenic diet. In case it wasn't obvious, that's pretty drastic for someone grooming over four hours a day. Their fat percentage of 7.6% dropped to 5% – lower than many bodybuilders in contest shape – in thirty days. Fifty-fifty nether these weather condition, they gained 0.9 pounds of lean body mass. And don't forget they must have lost a lot of glycogen and water eating just 22 grams of carbs a day.
• Similar findings of positive body recomposition take been plant in elite athletes of diverse other sports,
• This report and this study both plant positive body recomposition in competitive rugby players.
• This study found positive body recomposition in men benching well over 4 plates.
• This study constitute positive body recomposition in NCAA Sectionalisation football players already squatting over 382 lb (174 kg) and benching over 289 lb (131 kg).
• Fifty-fifty some women competing in the IFBB have been found to gain muscle during contest prep during a study that carefully monitored their hormone levels.

Conclusion

Gaining muscle on a fat loss diet is absolutely possible. In fact, it should be expected for most people on a serious program. The more advanced you get, the harder it gets, and information technology'southward easier to gain muscle in free energy surplus, just body recomposition remains possible fifty-fifty in well-trained individuals. Equally long equally the stimulus for muscle growth is carefully designed and customized, your muscles have the means to get bigger without energy surplus. Your body is not the enemy. It is a miraculous survival automobile that adapts to the stress you lot impose on it. When you empathize it, you lot tin command information technology.

And then screw the naysayers. When you don't believe what yous want is possible, yous have defeated yourself before yous even began.

brownclor1936.blogspot.com

Source: https://mennohenselmans.com/gain-muscle-and-lose-fat-at-the-same-time/

Share this post